[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail-mbox branch
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail-mbox branch |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:36:35 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> > MIME media-type text bodies may use Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit,
> > which would allow you to save the predecoded text body. But who
> > cares? Nobody sends multimegabyte text/plain messages; decoding per
> > display is not an efficiency problem.
>
> Indeed, decoding upon display is not a problem. The problem that's new
> for Pmail is that Rmail allows the user to edit a message, so Pmail will
> need to be able to re-encode a displayed message.
Yup.
Continuing to maintain Rmail, even with a more-commonly-used mailbox
format, is going to be an ongoing headache IMO.
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, (continued)
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, tomas, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stefan Monnier, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/09/10
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stefan Monnier, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Kenichi Handa, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stefan Monnier, 2008/09/04
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/04
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/09/01
Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/01
Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/01