Re: Building Emacs fails on Cygwin

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Paul Reilly writes:

 > Seems to me that this is merely a short term fix until the next time 
 > Emacs needs more heap.  Is it impossible/impractical to find a mechanism 
 > to determine how big this requirement should be at build time so the 
 > problem can be solved forever?

It's not impossible because XEmacs and SXEmacs do it.  I don't know
the code though so that's as far as I can help.