Re: (featurep 'multi-tty) => t on Windows

[Chetan Pandya]

Wouldn't it make more sense for it to be DOS_NT?
In general, I like the idea of feature based defines to deal with any changes 
here.

Chetan

--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> wrote:

> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: (featurep 'multi-tty) => t on Windows
> To: "Chong Yidong" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Emacs Devel" <address@hidden>
> Date: Thursday, December 11, 2008, 9:47 AM
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 17:16, Chong Yidong
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> >>    (if (featurep 'multi-tty) ",
> multi-tty" ""))
> >
> > I think this feature should be nil on Windows.  Go
> ahead and make the
> > change.
> 
> I hadn't thought of any specific change. We can wrap
> the Fprovide into #ifdefs
> 
> #ifndef WINDOWSNT
>   Fprovide (intern ("multi-tty"), Qnil);
> #endif
> 
> if nobody thinks of a better way.
> 
>     Juanma