[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time val
From: |
dhruva |
Subject: |
Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Jan 2009 10:29:59 +0530 |
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:13:05 +0530
>> From: dhruva <address@hidden>
>> Cc: "Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden>, "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden>,
>> address@hidden
>>
>> Here is a modified patch that seems to give me different values! Not
>> sure how to interpret it though :(
>
> Use Proced, it will display them in human-readable format. Do the
> values it shows seem reasonable?
It does. But I notice process started in 2008 have the year and 00:00
in the start time. Maybe, it is a separate issue.
Ex:
dhruva 1400 0.0 1.1 10:21 00:00 emacs.exe
dhruva 2476 0.0 0.1 10:20 00:00 cmd.exe
dhruva 2340 0.0 2.7 08:50 00:00 opera.exe
dhruva 4252 0.0 1.4 2008 00:01 procexp.exe
dhruva 2956 0.0 0.6 2008 00:00 BTSTAC~1.EXE
dhruva 1912 0.0 0.2 2008 00:00 DLG.exe
> Anyway, I don't like fixing a problem we don't understand. I'd like
> to find out what is wrong with the original code, before we start
> looking for alternative ways of doing 64-bit arithmetics.
I agree. I notice the problem might be due to signed and unsigned. The
FILETIME high or low part if interpreted as 'long double' which is
signed shows negative value as in 'convert_raw_time' function.
Anyway, I will continue to explore this to the best of my abilities.
-dhruva
--
Contents reflect my personal views only!
Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/01
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/01
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/02
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/03
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/03
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/03
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/03
- Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/03