[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving to bzr?
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Moving to bzr? |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:48:07 +0100 |
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> > Is "bzr pull" the equivalent of "cvs up -d"? That is, is that the
> > command to resync with the master repository? Because if it is, it is
> > slower than CVS by a large margin (but so is git's 3 min, so I assume
> > "bzr pull" is not the equivalent of "cvs up -d").
>
> Are you testing on Windows? git has historically had performance
> problems on Windows because its Unix-oriented optimizations are often
> pessimizations on Windows.
Does this mean bzr is unusable for w32 users (for a large project like Emacs)?
- Re: bzr repository ready?, (continued)
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Andreas Schwab, 2009/01/30
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Karl Fogel, 2009/01/30
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Andreas Schwab, 2009/01/30
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Karl Fogel, 2009/01/30
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/31
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Andreas Schwab, 2009/01/31
- Re: Moving to bzr?, John Yates, 2009/01/21
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/21
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/22
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Giorgos Keramidas, 2009/01/13
- Re: Moving to bzr?,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Karl Fogel, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Nick Roberts, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/05
- Message not available
- Re: Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/06
- Re: Moving to bzr?, 马旋(SuperMMX), 2009/01/06
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Daniel Clemente, 2009/01/06