[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: x-font-family-list
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: x-font-family-list |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:15:14 +0200 |
> From: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:32:52 -0500
>
> I don't think it's important, but am not sure whether there is any
> external code relying on it. Normally, this means that we should try to
> change the compatibility function and make it compatible. But, I don't
> know a simple way of computing whether a font is fixed-pitch using the
> new font code, without jumping through some ugly hoops (e.g., somehow
> turning each family name into an xlfd and examining its "monospace"
> entry). If no one can suggest a good method, let's just delete the
> function.
Either delete it entirely, or make it signal an error.
- x-font-family-list, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/09
- Re: x-font-family-list, Chong Yidong, 2009/01/09
- Re: x-font-family-list, Leo, 2009/01/09
- Re: x-font-family-list,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: x-font-family-list, Chong Yidong, 2009/01/10
- Re: x-font-family-list, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/10
- Re: x-font-family-list, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/10
- Re: x-font-family-list, Jason Rumney, 2009/01/10
- Re: x-font-family-list, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/10