[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pretest next week
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Pretest next week |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:36:31 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:46:29 +0900
> From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden>
>
> I'm really surprised to hear that it hasn't have the top priority.
> I've been thinking that proper C-g handling is a minimum requirement
> to be a part of the official Emacs rather than an unofficial
> distribution.
What is "improper" in how C-g is handled on Cocoa?
- Re: Pretest next week, (continued)
Re: Pretest next week, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/22
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/22
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/01/24
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/26
- Re: Pretest next week, Chong Yidong, 2009/01/26
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/26
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/01/27
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/27
Re: Pretest next week,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/26
Re: Pretest next week, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/26
Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/27
Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/01/27
Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/28
Re: Pretest next week, Alex Ott, 2009/01/24
Re: Pretest next week, Bastien, 2009/01/22