[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interactive hat.
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Interactive hat. |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:02:46 +0100 |
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>> Based on my years of experience with CUA-mode, I fully agree with Alan.
>> Using symbol property + dedicated pre/post hooks is IMHO superior to
>> interactive-hat for several reasons (that I gave a long time ago).
>
> I don't think the giant glutinous mess that is CUA-mode is a
> particularly compelling example...
Why not? Kim gave reasons.
- Re: Interactive hat., (continued)
- Re: Interactive hat., Stefan Monnier, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Stefan Monnier, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Stefan Monnier, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Kim F. Storm, 2009/03/28
- Re: Interactive hat., Miles Bader, 2009/03/28
- Re: Interactive hat.,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: Interactive hat., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Miles Bader, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/03/26
Re: Interactive hat., Stefan Monnier, 2009/03/25
Re: Interactive hat. [Was: CUA-like stuff spuriously enables transient-mark-mode], Juanma Barranquero, 2009/03/25