[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interactive hat. (Patch)
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Interactive hat. (Patch) |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:22:53 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi, Miles!
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 07:50:01AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > + * Non-string Interactive:: Non-string equivalents of the letter-codes.
> The phrase "non-string interactive" sounds kind of awkward to
> me... maybe something like "evaluated interactive forms" or "code
> interactive forms" might be better...
But also more confusing. "non-string" is at least accurate. There's no
compelling reason a non-string form MUST be evaluated. It could
conceivably be a constant list which has been evaluated at compile time,
for example. OK, maybe that's too implausible.
Maybe a compromise would be better, leaving the node name, but amending
the comment. Say:
* Non-string Interactive:: Explicitly evaluated equivalents of the
letter-codes.
, or something like that.
> -Miles
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: Interactive hat. (Patch V2), (continued)
- Re: Interactive hat. (Patch V2), Karl Berry, 2009/04/27
- Re: Interactive hat. (Patch V2), Miles Bader, 2009/04/27
- Re: Interactive hat. (Patch V2), Eli Zaretskii, 2009/04/28
- Re: Interactive hat. (Patch V2), Alan Mackenzie, 2009/04/28
- Re: Interactive hat. (Patch V2), Alan Mackenzie, 2009/04/28
Re: Interactive hat. (Patch), Miles Bader, 2009/04/13
- Re: Interactive hat. (Patch),
Alan Mackenzie <=