[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:05:06 -0400 |
> It is somewhat dangerous _because_ it has a key binding.
No, it was claimed that the command's behavior itself is dangerous, which
means
regardless of how it is called.
Practically speaking, it is only dangerous because of the key binding.
If people had to run it with M-x, they would not type it by habit,
so it would not cause a problem.
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, (continued)
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/03
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Bob Rogers, 2009/07/04
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/05
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Bob Rogers, 2009/07/05
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/05
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Johan Bockgård, 2009/07/07
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/05
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/05
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/04
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/05
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful,
Richard Stallman <=
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/06
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/07
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Robert J. Chassell, 2009/07/06
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/06
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/06
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/07
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/08
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/09
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/09
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/09