Re: C-x C-v considered harmful

[Stefan Monnier]

> This did not occur to me.  But I notice that typing "C-x C-v d RET"
> fails to require a "[Confirm]" if the value of
> confirm-nonexistent-file-or-buffer is after-completion.  Since this is

Oops, indeed, I forgot about this "detail".  Thanks for reminding me.

>    And it doesn't help at all with the fact that even "C-x k" is skimpy
> in the warning department.  Are you rejecting Drew's argument that it is
> really kill-buffer that needs attention (at least when invoked
> interactively)?

I do not oppose the change to kill-buffer, no.
I'm just happy that this thread pointed out the lack of support for
confirm-nonexistent-file-or-buffer in C-x C-v (and did so before the
release).


        Stefan