[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why are there two dolist?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Why are there two dolist? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:54:14 +0900 |
Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
> I do not understand your code above, but is not the conclusion that
> the cl-macs.el version does not do what it is supposed to do? What
> value does it have then? (Perhaps it can be fixed, I don't know.)
It need not work perfectly to have value.
I don't know whether CL return-from is defined to work across
function-call boundaries, but the vast majority of uses are far simpler,
and the cl.el version should work fine in those cases.
[cl.el is not anywhere close to being truly CL-compatible in general]
-Miles
--
Opportunity, n. A favorable occasion for grasping a disappointment.
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, (continued)
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/08/11