[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of IPA patch?
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Status of IPA patch? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:45:24 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> > > > (Is there any other major software to be compatible with?)
> > >
> > > Well, SCIM, but that’s not really major. My friend Clint, here:
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=499558 preferred the
> > > script G when he adapted the Kirshenbaum method to SCIM, and didn’t
> > > offere a choice; if anyone has an SCIM install, I’d be curious as to
> > > what that does with its X-SAMPA input.
> >
> > Both X-SAMPA and Kirshenbaum SCIM inputs use U+0261 for `g'.
> >
> > IPA-X-SAMPA:
> > g ɡ 0 # U+0261 LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT G
> >
> > IPA-Kirshenbaum:
> > g ɡ 0 # U+0261 LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT G
> >
> > I see no reason to deviate from this standard in Emacs.
>
> SCIM is a standard? Interesting perspective.
SCIM follows the standard, so there is no reason for Emacs
not to do the same.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/25
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Glenn Morris, 2009/08/25
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/27
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/27
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28