[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Language identification
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Language identification |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:27:54 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> >> Is there a reason why users don't use the existing reliable mechanism?
> > Many of the authors don't use Emacs, is my guess.
>
> You mean they're still using `ed'? Boggles the mind!
Sure, you could have too, and that probably would have been for the
best. But freedom to choose is what GNU's all about, and I'm glad you
had the choice (even though you failed to choose ed(1), the Godfather
of editors).
If-my-tongue-were-any-further-in-cheek-it-would-be-in-Mozambique-ly y'rs
- Re: using libmagic in Emacs?, (continued)
- Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/30
- Re: Language identification, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: Language identification, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/28
- Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/30
- Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/29
- Re: Language identification, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/29
- Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/30
- Re: Language identification, David Kastrup, 2009/08/31
- Re: Language identification, Jan D., 2009/08/31
- Re: Language identification, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/30