[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Sep 2009 06:20:01 +0300 |
> From: Ken Raeburn <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:39:32 -0400
> Cc: Emacs development discussions <address@hidden>
>
> > Files loaded by loadup.el are easily extracted by simple text
> > scanning, and the byte compiler itself indeed _is_ a prerequisite for
> > every other compilation.
>
> But if a minor comment change is made in the compiler source, must we
> recompile everything?
Yes, why not?
> We don't generally make .o files explicitly depend on the C
> compiler.
If a compiler can change the ABI, you must.
> > Btw, I don't understand what problem do you see with files preloaded
> > by loadup. They should simply be all prerequisites of temacs, and
> > that's it, right?
>
>
> Well, "emacs", not "temacs" which is just linked from the C code, but
> also I was assuming we wouldn't make the emacs binary an explicit
> dependency for the .elc files
Not all of them, just those that are preloaded. We already have that
dependency:
emacs${EXEEXT}: temacs${EXEEXT} ${etc}DOC ${lisp} ${SOME_MACHINE_LISP}
> otherwise, someone downloading and
> building a release will have to recompile all the elisp code
I don't see why. Please explain.
> On the other hand, we probably don't want to recompile
> everything because lisp/language/georgian.el changed.
No, we don't, but I don't see how would that happen. You just need to
re-dump.
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, (continued)
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. A workaround., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. A workaround., Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/09/07
Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/08
Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Miles Bader, 2009/09/07