[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Package Management
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Package Management |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:50:45 -0400 |
One question. Common Lisp's sequence functions operate on, um,
sequences (lists or vectors or strings). Should emacs' versions do the
same or be restricted to the simpler list case?
There is no point in making them handle anything but lists.
- Re: Emacs Package Management, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Package Management, joakim, 2009/09/14
- Re: Emacs Package Management, David Kastrup, 2009/09/14
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Miles Bader, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Miles Bader, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/16
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/16
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Geoff Gole, 2009/09/16
- Re: Emacs Package Management,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tassilo Horn, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, joakim, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Lennart Borgman, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tassilo Horn, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Lennart Borgman, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Rupert Swarbrick, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Bob Rogers, 2009/09/18
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Rupert Swarbrick, 2009/09/19