[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:56:16 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> I really can't imagine why "tag" would be a problem. "tag" is suppose
>> to tag exactly the revisions of the files you have currently checked
>> out, so if those files are fine, so is your tag.
> That's exactly the problem. Your checked out files may be out of date
> wrt. the repository.
"Out of date" in which sense? You mean, there might have been some
commits performed since? Of course, that's true, but it doesn't matter
because "tag" will use the revisions in your tree, which should all be
self-consistent. So it will be the same result as if "tag" was
performed (onsistently) when your file have been checked out
(i.e. before the checkins that may have happened in the mean time).
You can checkout, wait for a year, and then perform "tag", and it will
still be consistent.
Stefan
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, (continued)
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Chong Yidong, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, David Kastrup, 2009/12/10
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/12/10
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Steven Knight, 2009/12/09