[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:46:34 +0100 |
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> But it probably thrashes wildly because Bzr ends up using more than
>>> 500MB.
>> Indeed, it eats the memory + 500 MB swap, but there's still 500 MB
>> swap availaible, so I can't explain myself this behavior.
>
> The amount of swap left is mostly irrelevant. What matters is that
> there more memory in active use than the amount of RAM you have, so the
> system spends its time moving data back&forth between RAM and swap,
> which brings the whole system to a crawl.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrash_%28computer_science%29
Is it the design or the algorithm that are the problem?
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, (continued)
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, Jason Earl, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, Jason Earl, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/08
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/08
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, Yavor Doganov, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Thrashing [was: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/07
- Re: Thrashing [was: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?], Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow? [was: branch], Alan Mackenzie, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Jan Djärv, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Glenn Morris, 2010/01/07