[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr workflow
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: bzr workflow |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:05:51 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
Sam Steingold <address@hidden> writes:
> On 1/11/10, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Sam Steingold <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > 1. Am I the only one who thinks this is a little too convoluted? (the only
>> > other DVC I regularly use is hg, and there the workflow is "commit+push"
>> > instead of the recommended emacs workflow "commit+merge+commit").
>>
>>
>> Nothing stops you from using the more advanced workflow.
>
> what "more advanced workflow"?
The one you are used to.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- bzr workflow, Sam Steingold, 2010/01/11
- Re: bzr workflow, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/11
- Re: bzr workflow, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/11
- Re: bzr workflow, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/11
- Re: bzr workflow, Jan Djärv, 2010/01/12
- Re: bzr workflow, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/12
- Re: bzr workflow, Jan Djärv, 2010/01/12
- Re: bzr workflow, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/12
- Re: bzr workflow, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/12
- Re: bzr workflow, Jan D., 2010/01/13
- Re: bzr workflow, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/12
- Re: bzr workflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/12