[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No commit in vc?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: No commit in vc? |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:35:13 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:49:11 -0800 (PST)
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> Cc: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> It's still too terse. The goal is to explain what is going on to people
> that are not used to bzr, and will get confused by getting an error on a
> subsequent selective commit.
I agree.
> What's the reason not to have a very clear and unambiguous explanation?
> If it avoids reading help/ searching for clues, user will only be happy.
>
> Here's a new version of this, just replace this function in vc-bzr.el
> Please feel free to improve the text.
I'm fine with it, I would just replace
before being able to check in anything else
with
before being able to check in any further changes
because technically, "commit" and "check in" are synonyms.
- Re: No commit in vc?, (continued)
- Re: No commit in vc?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/31
- Re: No commit in vc?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/01/31
- Re: No commit in vc?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2010/01/31
- Re: No commit in vc?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/31
- Re: No commit in vc?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/01/31
- Re: No commit in vc?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/01/30
- Re: No commit in vc?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: No commit in vc?, Juri Linkov, 2010/01/30
- Re: No commit in vc?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/01/31
- Re: No commit in vc?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/29
- Re: No commit in vc?, Juri Linkov, 2010/01/30
- Re: No commit in vc?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/30