[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m? |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:06:44 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> Probably doesn't make any difference: he would have typed "bzr add ."
> rather than "bzr add" and the result would have been the same.
No, I think that's wrong.
I don't really know why he typed "bzr add" (i.e., whether by sheer
accident, or in confusion about what it did), but in general it seems
_much_ more likely for somebody to accidentally type a command with no
arguments, than with an explicit "this directory".
Thus given the somewhat rare nature of needing to do such a thing, this
default for "bzr seems" an exceedingly poor choice. Hopefully the bzr
devs will change this.
-Miles
--
Selfish, adj. Devoid of consideration for the selfishness of others.
- Re: emacs-w3m?,
Miles Bader <=