> If is no necessary to save windows. You'd just use the same configuration
> to show the same buffers, i.e. throw them at "display-buffer" which calls
> into your window manager which will create windows in the same place as
before
> by definition, because to do this is the whole point of it: To make sure
> that same (class of) content is presented to the user in the same trusty
> topological position always.
`display-buffer' is completely untrustworthy in this regard. The
trustworthy primitives to do what you mean are `split-window' and
`set-window-buffer'.