[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Window configurations
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Window configurations |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:38:38 +0200 |
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>> What I meant was that the current implementation gives very contrived
>> semantics.
>
> I know. Maybe we should "fix it", as you implicitly suggested, by
> simply always doing a set-buffer. It's fairly risky, kind of like
> replacing every (save-excursion (set-buffer foo) bar) with
> (with-current-buffer foo bar) ;-)
Why is it risky? This is on the display level so to say and always
associated with windows on the display. I think there will be no big
surprises.
- Re: Window configurations, (continued)
- Re: Window configurations, martin rudalics, 2010/06/04
- Re: Window configurations, Juri Linkov, 2010/06/04
- Re: Window configurations, martin rudalics, 2010/06/05
- Re: Window configurations, Juri Linkov, 2010/06/05
- Re: Window configurations, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/05
- Re: Window configurations, Juri Linkov, 2010/06/07
- Re: Window configurations, martin rudalics, 2010/06/06
- Re: Window configurations, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/06
- Re: Window configurations, martin rudalics, 2010/06/07
- Re: Window configurations, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/07
- Re: Window configurations,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: Window configurations, martin rudalics, 2010/06/08
- Re: Window configurations, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/08
- Re: Window configurations, martin rudalics, 2010/06/11
- Re: Window configurations, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/11
- Re: Window configurations, martin rudalics, 2010/06/11
Re: Window configurations, martin rudalics, 2010/06/29