emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?


From: Yavor Doganov
Subject: Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:15:47 +0300
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 Emacs/23.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Emacs sources use the idiom
> 
> #include <config.h>

The Autoconf manual recommends this practice.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]