|
From: | Yavor Doganov |
Subject: | Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ? |
Date: | Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:15:47 +0300 |
User-agent: | Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 Emacs/23.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Emacs sources use the idiom > > #include <config.h> The Autoconf manual recommends this practice.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |