Re: Buffer names are sometimes read-only objects in daemonized emacs

[Stefan Monnier]

> No no, you got me wrong.  I just meant the docstring of `buffer-name'
> (and any other function that returns some thing whose modification would
> have undesired, non-obvious side-effects) should explicitly state that
> modifying that returned string will indeed modify the buffer name.

Rather, `aset' should warn that modifying strings is evil and dangerous.


        Stefan "whose aset refuses to do it"