[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Key bindings proposal

From: Davis Herring
Subject: RE: Key bindings proposal
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5_4.10.lanl3

> But then there needs to be an unambigous way to specify an underscore
> itself as an accelerator char.  Perhaps `___' (3 or them) could (be
> made to) do that.

"___" (with any following character) is already a literal underscore and
an accelerator-prefix, so that doesn't work.  You'd have to have "__U" be
a literal underscore and "__A" be an accelerator underscore (leaving all
other "__?" patterns undefined for future expansion).


This product is sold by volume, not by mass.  If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]