[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: e and pi
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: e and pi |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:00:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> This is my understanding: You want bindings to behave like in Common
> Lisp, and have all special variables (i.e., things that have been
> defined with defvar) to have dynamic scope (like today), and have all
> the rest have lexical bindings. And the problem is that some variables
> (well, constants) like `e' and `pi' are likely to be used by people in
> bindings, so they'll get dynamic bindings where they don't expect it.
> Is that a fair summary?
Yes.
> (Although I don't really see how not using function arguments as dynamic
> bindings really help much, but I agree that it's confusing.)
It's only remotely related, indeed.
Stefan
- RE: e and pi, (continued)
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Uday S Reddy, 2010/09/18
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: e and pi, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/09/19
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, tomas, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, David Kastrup, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, tomas, 2010/09/19
- Re: e and pi, Uday S Reddy, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi, Sam Steingold, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi, MON KEY, 2010/09/17