[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EMACS_INT cleanup

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Subject: Re: EMACS_INT cleanup
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:00:07 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> void
>> message3 (Lisp_Object m, int nbytes, int multibyte)
>> So we can only do a message that's 2GB big?  Well, OK, but is that a
>> problem? 
> Why bother thinking?  Why not just replace int with EMACS_INT?

I'm just querying the list about what they think the general policy for
this should be.  I (personally) think all this should be fixed, so that
the gcc warnings would actually be useful, but since -Wall is in the
state it's in, I was assuming that there might be a reason for that

(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]