[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default to using imagemagick?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Default to using imagemagick? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:32:17 +0900 |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
>> Is there any reason imagemagick doesn't default to "on"?
>
> Nobody protested, so I flipped the imagemagick defaults.
> --without-imagemagick if you don't want it.
Probably a good idea.
I was just reading through the ImageMagick API docs though, and man
does it have the Most Gratuitously Awful Naming Scheme Ever --
practically every function/type name is _absurdly_ generic (e.g.,
"ReadStream", "ExceptionInfo", "GetGeometry", ...), and seem almost
intended to cause conflicts with user programs (or other libraries
with poorly named functions). [this is in C, remember, no namespaces]
Gahhh.. this is the GNU standard image library?!
-Miles
p.s., of course I'm ignoring the cutesy names, which are merely
silly, not an actual hazard...
--
Road, n. A strip of land along which one may pass from where it is too
tiresome to be to where it is futile to go.