Re: backtrace sets print-level to 3

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> and got this backtrace:
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments frame-parameter 1)
>   (frame-parameter (quote foo))
>   eval((frame-parameter (quote foo)))
>   eval-last-sexp-1(t)
>   eval-last-sexp(t)
>   eval-print-last-sexp()
>   call-interactively(eval-print-last-sexp nil nil)
>
> This is more than 3 levels, and actually is a full backtrace, right
> upto call-interactively.  So it looks like there's no stack depth
> limitation at work here.

Is there anything there with more than three levels, though?

(frame-parameter '(1 (2 (3 (4)))))

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments frame-parameter 1)
  (frame-parameter (quote (1 ...)))
  eval((frame-parameter (quote (1 ...))))
  eval-last-sexp-1(nil)
  eval-last-sexp(nil)
  call-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil nil)


-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen