|
From: | Chong Yidong |
Subject: | Re: testing framework and package.el |
Date: | Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:48:28 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Christian Ohler <address@hidden> writes: > I suspect it would be easier if the convention was that a file > /some/path/foo.el had its tests in /some/path/test/foo.el. The > convention of having a top-level src/ and test/ split makes sense in > Java because of its package file layout and visibility rules, but > Emacs Lisp has no such constraints. Has anyone else thought about the > pros and cons of these different conventions? Is there a deep reason > why Emacs currently has test/ as a separate top-level directory? Because the test files are not to be distributed with the tarball.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |