[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: URL + efs confusion
From: |
Davis Herring |
Subject: |
Re: URL + efs confusion |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:57:55 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5_4.10.lanl3 |
> I can't think of any situations where somebody would knowingly create a
> URL with the Emacs /foo:/-syntax. It's possible that somebody has
> created Emacs-specific HTML that uses this, but it seems rather
> unlikely.
If it did, it would be incorrect to give such a URL a file: scheme,
because it's not a file name. "/foo:/bar" ought to be emacs://foo/bar or
perhaps emacs://ftp/foo/bar (taking the access mode to be the authority; I
don't remember if you can stack access modes).
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
- URL + efs confusion, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/15
- Re: URL + efs confusion, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/11/15
- Re: URL + efs confusion, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/15
- Re: URL + efs confusion, Michael Albinus, 2010/11/16
- Re: URL + efs confusion, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/11/16
- Re: URL + efs confusion, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/16
- Re: URL + efs confusion,
Davis Herring <=
- Re: URL + efs confusion, David Kastrup, 2010/11/16
- Re: URL + efs confusion, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/16
- Re: URL + efs confusion, Michael Albinus, 2010/11/16
- Re: URL + efs confusion, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/11/16
- Re: URL + efs confusion, Michael Albinus, 2010/11/16