[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:26:15 -0500 |
> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:57:27 +0900
>
> > . changed TTY display top enclose U+nnnn and "empty box" displays in
> > "[]", to simulate a box and make the display easier to read.
>
> For U+NNNN, I decided not to use "[]" because it takes too
> many columns. I thought underline or some background color
> (customizable through a face) was enough. Don't you think 8
> columns (instead of 6 columns) is annoying?
It is annoying allright, but [U+1234][U+5678] is more readable than
U+1234U+5678. However, if others disagree, I can change that back.
> > . documented this feature in NEWS and in the manual.
>
> I dared not write that because I have not yet made my mind
> which is better; current glyphless-char-display or extending
> the normal display-table.
By the way, one other issue is that display tables take precedence
over glyphless-char-display, in the sense that characters for which
there are non-trivial entries in the current display table are
displayed using the display table, disregarding any
glyphless-char-display-control settings. If this is what we want, we
should probably document that.
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, (continued)
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/01
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Kenichi Handa, 2010/11/01
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/13
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Kenichi Handa, 2010/11/17
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Kenichi Handa, 2010/11/17
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/17
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/17
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/13
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/13
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Kenichi Handa, 2010/11/16
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/17
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/17
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/20
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/19
- Prev by Date:
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
- Next by Date:
Re: display bug for empty lines in recent git snapshot
- Previous by thread:
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
- Next by thread:
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
- Index(es):