[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:29:43 +0900 |
Sorry for the late response on this matter.
In article <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:26:15 -0500
> > Cc: address@hidden
> >
> > By the way, one other issue is that display tables take precedence
> > over glyphless-char-display, in the sense that characters for which
> > there are non-trivial entries in the current display table are
> > displayed using the display table, disregarding any
> > glyphless-char-display-control settings. If this is what we want, we
> > should probably document that.
IF that is what we want, we surely should document that.
But, as I wrote before, I'm still hesitating over which is
better; keeping glyphless-char-display separate from display
table, or integrating that functionality to display table.
> And another issue: the character group c0-control includes the
> newline. So if the display of this group is set to anything at all,
> the newlines are not displayed as such. I doubt that users would
> expect or want that when they customize the display of c0-control. So
> maybe we should exempt newline (and perhaps also TAB) from this group;
> users who really want that can always set glyphless-char-display
> directly.
> WDYT?
I agree on exempting TAB and NL from c0-control group.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, (continued)
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/20
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/17
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/26
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/27
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Kenichi Handa, 2010/11/29
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/29
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/20
- Prev by Date:
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
- Next by Date:
Re: gnutls status
- Previous by thread:
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
- Next by thread:
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
- Index(es):