[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:47:31 +0900 |
Lennart Borgman writes:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
> > You didn't say what you meant by it. How is it different? You
> > are arguing that a key that has some action outside Emacs should
> > necessarily have the same action inside Emacs.
That may or may not be what he's arguing, but it seems to me the
question here is "if a key has a familiar 'generic' binding that is
applicable to and useful in Emacs, *and* Emacs itself doesn't bind
that key, should Emacs 'use' the generic binding by default?" And the
answer "yes" follows from the principle of least astonishment.
Since Windows has a way of providing a fallback binding for events, it
seems to me that unless Emacs has a reason *not* to use that fallback,
such as "Emacs has bound a function to that event" or "in Emacs that
behavior is stupid/useless/harmful" or "the user says he doesn't like
it", it should be allowed to fall through to the fallback when the
Emacs binding is void.
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, (continued)
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/14
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/14
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/14
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/14
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/16
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Philipp Haselwarter, 2011/01/16
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, PJ Weisberg, 2011/01/14
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/14
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/14
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/15
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/16