[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:27:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
grischka <address@hidden> writes:
>> This is unnecesary too. Alt-F4 must work irrespectively of the prefix
>> keys typed so far: if you type C-x or C-h and then click on the Close
>> button on the top right of the frame, Emacs thinks you want to exit the
>> application. Alt-F4 must have the same effect as clicking that button
>> (when M-f4 is unbound on Emacs, hence the need for checking the binding
>> from the Windows event loop).
>
> A matter of taste.
Of consistency. Alt-F4 acts as the accelerator for the Close button and
the Close menu entry on the application system menu.
>>> (global-set-key [M-f4] 'w32-syskey)
>>
>> If we go that route why not just bind M-f4 to a function that closes the
>> current frame, as suggested at the beginning of this thread?
>
> Because you want to support menu accelerators [Alt-<letter>] ?
I was not thinking along that line. The global binding at the Lisp level
is simplest solution, although maybe not the optimum: it doesn't trigger
the exit procedure when typed with the C-h prefix, but some may view
that as an advantage. Possibly putting M-f4 on the minibuffer keymap we
could emulate the behavior describe on the top paragraph.
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, (continued)
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/01/17
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stuart Hacking, 2011/01/19
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/19
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, PJ Weisberg, 2011/01/19
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/20
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, PJ Weisberg, 2011/01/20
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/18
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/18
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18