|
| From: | Davis Herring |
| Subject: | RE: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Feb 2011 05:58:08 -0800 (PST) |
| User-agent: | SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5_4.10.lanl3 |
> Sure - just use a copy instead of a pointer. Having D copy from B is equivalent to having them both inherit from a new face A with B's previous definition. With the inheritance, the user does have the option to change both of them at once if desired. And we already have inheritance. Davis -- This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during shipping.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |