[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (patch) sort cycling completion candidates
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: (patch) sort cycling completion candidates |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:46:54 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:40:24 -0400 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> I am in favor of Antoine's patch: it fixes a bug and is cleaner, but I'm
>>>> citing both for completeness.
SM> Taking a closer look at those patches, I now wonder: should it take
SM> precedence over the "recently used" preference, as Antoine's does,
SM> or not? I'd tend to think it should not, as in the patch below.
>> I think either order is OK so whatever you think is right...
SM> I've installed something,
I see it came with r103674 but the notes are just in the ChangeLog and
in the source code. Do you want a doc patch or is it too early for
that?
Also what about the completion candidate sorting (with
:completion-penalty and :completion-candidate-penalty properties to
supplement :completion-cycle-penalty)? Do you think that's worthwhile?
Thanks
Ted