[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A better autogen.sh
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: A better autogen.sh |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:03:54 +0200 |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:15:53 +0200
>> Cc: address@hidden
>>
>> As far as I know, bzr does not have a way to deposit a
>> non-version-controlled file in a just checked-out directory.
>
> What do you mean by that?
I see no ambiguity.
Please rephrase the question to explain
precisely what you don't understand.
> What would you do with git in this situation?
git cannot do that either.
Adding non-VC'd files is not the job of a version control system.
That's why there's a separate build script.
- Re: A better autogen.sh, (continued)
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Jim Meyering, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Andreas Schwab, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Jim Meyering, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Jim Meyering, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, chad, 2011/03/29
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Jim Meyering, 2011/03/30
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/30
- Re: A better autogen.sh,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/30
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Jim Meyering, 2011/03/30
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/30
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/30
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/30
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/30
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/31
Re: A better autogen.sh [was Re: Still unable to build trunk], Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/28