[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: splitting ChangeLogs
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: splitting ChangeLogs |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:58:28 +0900 |
Glenn Morris writes:
> Shouldn't ChangeLog should keep its current file-id, so that eg merged
> entries from emacs-23 go to the correct file? The current lisp/ChangeLog
> has a log that goes back to 1999.
Argh. Got that backward, myself (git-thinking strikes!) Yes, that's
the right thing to do. ChangeLog.11 will presumably never change in
the future, so its identity is not terribly interesting.
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, (continued)
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/05
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/07
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Glenn Morris, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06
Message not availableRe: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Glenn Morris, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06