[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nested display strings
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Nested display strings |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:17:12 +0300 |
> From: Michael Welsh Duggan <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:19:38 -0400
>
> I'm of the opinion that it should either display: STRING1 or
> STRING1STRING2STRING1, and which doesn't really matter.
That is, you think that doing that without setting priorities invokes
"undefined behavior".
> If I had to choose, however, I would prefer that if two overlays
> with the same priority appear over the same character, whichever
> overlay that has the earlier start should take precedence (giving us
> STRING1 in this case).
I tend to agree.
> Please note, that if myov1 had a specifically higher priority than
> myov2, I think STRING1STRING2STRING1 is a perfectly valid result.
You mean, if myov2 has higher priority, right? Because if myov1 has
higher priority, we display just STRING1, as expected.
- Re: Nested display strings, (continued)
- Re: Nested display strings, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/27
- Re: Nested display strings, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/28
- Re: Nested display strings, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/28
- Re: Nested display strings, Chong Yidong, 2011/04/26
- Re: Nested display strings, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/26
- Re: Nested display strings, Richard Stallman, 2011/04/26
Re: Nested display strings, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2011/04/24