Re: debbugs.el revisited

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:

> It was fast for a brief time after it moved to its new server, but
> lately it seems to be slow again.
>
> If you've got a documented case, you can ask address@hidden

For instance this one.

Message-ID: <address@hidden>

[...]

Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
        by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>)
        id 1QcN8j-00046m-Mw
        for address@hidden; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:43:05 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60487 helo=lists.gnu.org)
        by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>)
        id 1QcN8i-000440-CW
        for address@hidden; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:43:04 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40891)
        by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>) id 1QcLUk-0000Fh-SN
        for address@hidden; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:57:44 -0400

All these time zones makes it a bit more difficult to read, but
eggs.gnu.org got this at 13:57:44 -0400, and lists.gnu.org got or sent
it at 15:43:04 -0400.  Which is a delay of almost two hours...

Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 
4.71)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>) id 1QcLUi-000194-1K
        for address@hidden; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:57:42 -0400
Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:39148)
        by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>) id 1QcLUh-00018r-Bw
        for address@hidden; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:57:39 -0400
Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>) id 1QcLUg-0002FF-6e
        for address@hidden; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:57:38 +0200


-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/