[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: switch-to-buffer: for interactive use only

From: Juanma Barranquero
Subject: Re: switch-to-buffer: for interactive use only
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 01:41:11 +0200

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 01:32, Glenn Morris <address@hidden> wrote:

> (I knew the first comment would be something along
> these lines.)

But, seriously, IIUC the intent of Martin's changes, one of the goals
is to help differentiate between user commands and elisp functions;
packages should use functions that express the intent of the code, and
make use of the SPECIFIERS and LABEL args to indicate any non-standard
behavior (that the user can override with display-buffer-alist). I
don't find hard to believe than in many of these 471 cases, what the
code pretends is more akin to `pop-to-buffer-same-window' than to


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]