[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: zap-to-char too raw, or document

From: Andreas Röhler
Subject: Re: zap-to-char too raw, or document
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:36:02 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv: Gecko/20110616 SUSE/3.1.11 Thunderbird/3.1.11

Am 17.07.2011 13:18, schrieb Andreas Schwab:
Andreas Röhler<address@hidden>  writes:

When I answer a y/n style question, I would not want to have a
latin-1-postfix input method waiting in order to figure out whether I
want to adorn my n with a ~ in order to get ñ.

Where is the problem? User specifying a simple char will not notice the
extended capability.

How do you know the user doesn't want to input ñ as n~?


IIUC its upon changing the API so it would recognise an prefix-argument like C-u.

Calling that a " y/n style question" already has been misleading IMHO.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]