[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: smtp crap
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: smtp crap |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:21:05 +0200 |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 16:47, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > What benefits would writing a web page bring compared to the current
>> > mailclient implementation?
>>
>> I think that web pages will normally open in a web browser. So I guess
>> at least that part will work without problems for most users.
>
> Until someone decides to do for HTTP what they've just done for email: lead
> you
> down the garden path to choose Emacs as your Web browser.
If it works then it is no problem.
And I forgot to tell that there is another advantage with writing a
web page. You can write it so it has it has two links, one for
submitting it as a report through a web server (if the bug tracking
system allows for that).
- RE: smtp crap, (continued)
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Tim Cross, 2011/10/12
- Re: smtp crap, joakim, 2011/10/12
- Re: smtp crap, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/12
- Re: smtp crap, joakim, 2011/10/12
- Re: smtp crap, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/10/12
- Re: smtp crap, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/12
- Re: smtp crap, Jason Rumney, 2011/10/12
- Re: smtp crap, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/12
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/12
- Re: smtp crap,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: smtp crap, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/10/12
- Re: smtp crap, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/12
- Re: smtp crap, David Engster, 2011/10/08
- Re: smtp crap, Bastien, 2011/10/08
- Re: smtp crap, Miles Bader, 2011/10/08
- Re: smtp crap, Harry Putnam, 2011/10/08
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/10
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/10
- Re: smtp crap, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/10/10
- Re: smtp crap, Glenn Morris, 2011/10/10