[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Git mirrors
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Git mirrors |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:39:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Vijay Lakshminarayanan <address@hidden> writes:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> > > But your analogy fails, because the problem here is not whether
>> > > Óscar can *adapt* to Emacs' use of bzr. He can, and he can use git
>> > > (for developing Emacs) at the same time as bzr (for pushing his
>> > > contributions) if he wants to.
>> >
>> > Apparently, for Óscar is a problem.
>>
>> Why do you keep ignoring what he writes? Yes, he *wishes* Emacs used
>> git, but in this thread, he wants to know why GNU uses a policy that
>> appears to him to be counterproductive in a number of ways.
>
> I think Óscar's questions have been answered.
No.
> I think he has also made
> it quite clear that he doesn't fully understand the goals of the GNU
> project. For instance, in one post, he bemoaned the fact that GNU's
> wasn't focusing on "users" even though "users" were its greatest focus.
> Richard responded with, IMO, a good example comparing Skype helping
> users but not helping users freedoms.
And that makes cristal clear that you don't understand my
questions. Those involve *always* Free vs Free software, including
"GPLvX and later" vs "GPLvX and later". So the reference to Skype is
just another attempt at sidetracking the questions.
> Hopefully Óscar understands the GNU project better with this thread.
> That will be, IMO, the only good thing to come out of this huge
> flamewar.
Flamewar who? I made a series of questions about how GNU policies affect
non-GNU *FREE* software and how that fits the Free Software cause as a
whole. Because GNU is just an instrument of the FSF to promote Free
Software, and that may be at odds with such policies. Some people
(including you) insist on talking about unrelated issues (Skype,
my-dvcs-is-better-than-yours, etc.)
This is the second time that I make a question about core Free Software
issues on this list. Not only is this off-topic (for which I sincerely
apologize) but the result on both cases was just a gust of hot air with
some mixed sulfur.
Please note that I'm restraining myself from following up most
messages. And no more questions. I promise.
- Re: Looming colocation [Was: Git mirrors], (continued)
- Re: Looming colocation [Was: Git mirrors], Barry Warsaw, 2011/10/17
- Looms and Pipelines (was Re: Git mirrors), Barry Warsaw, 2011/10/17
- Re: Git mirrors, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/14
- Re: Git mirrors, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/10/14
- Re: Git mirrors, Bastien, 2011/10/14
- Re: Git mirrors, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/10/14
- Re: Git mirrors, Bastien, 2011/10/14
- Re: Git mirrors, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/14
- Re: Git mirrors, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/17
- Re: Git mirrors, Vijay Lakshminarayanan, 2011/10/17
- Re: Git mirrors,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: Git mirrors, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/10/17
- Re: Git mirrors, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/17
- Re: Git mirrors, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/18
- Re: Git mirrors, Vijay Lakshminarayanan, 2011/10/17
- Re: Git mirrors, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/17
- Re: Git mirrors, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/18
- Re: Git mirrors, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/18
- Re: Git mirrors, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/14
- Re: Git mirrors, Michael Raitza, 2011/10/17
- Re: Git mirrors, Miles Bader, 2011/10/13