[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:43:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> Sorry, but may I ask what is the problem with the traditional names of
> these commands?
Confusion of operation and state based reasoning. People adopting the
latter were surprised that a horizontal split would produce a vertical
divider (among them ISTR Glenn Morris, Miles Bader and some people on
help-gnu-emacs).
> They seem to fit well into the systematics of other commands like
> mouse-split-window-{horizontally,vertically}
These should be probably renamed as well.
> and
> {enlarge,shrink}-window-horizontally.
Resizing is different because action- and state-based reasoning
coincide.
> Or is the plan to rename all
> of them?
martin
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, (continued)
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Deniz Dogan, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Dave Abrahams, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Ulrich Mueller, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, martin rudalics, 2011/10/26