[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#10150: deactive->inactive, inactivate->deactivate spelling fixes
From: |
Štěpán Němec |
Subject: |
Re: bug#10150: deactive->inactive, inactivate->deactivate spelling fixes |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:47:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:04:57 +0100
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 11/28/11 03:17, Štěpán Němec wrote:
>> By renaming functions and variables without any kind of deprecation
>> procedure (cf. `make-obsolete' and friends),
>
> Sure, we can do deprecation. Is the usual procedure to do this for
> all visible symbols, or only for the symbols that are documented
> in the manual?
You'd have to ask the maintainers for the definitive answer (emacs-devel
added to the Cc: list); I think it's usually closer to the latter.
IMO all commands, hooks and user variables definitely need deprecation,
the rest should at least be mentioned in NEWS.
--
Štěpán
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: bug#10150: deactive->inactive, inactivate->deactivate spelling fixes,
Štěpán Němec <=