[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:27:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:39:27 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
wrote:
LMI> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
>> It can work, with a lot of fiddling, but is unreliable and causes many
>> issues that are hard to replicate, timeouts especially. I don't know of
>> anyone happily using it on W32 and think disabling it on W32 is a good
>> choice.
LMI> If it can work, isn't there a way to make it work reliably? Where does
LMI> it fail, usually?
I don't know the answer to either question, you'll have to search
through the Gnus bugs for the last 10 years.
LMI> But if this is the case, I can add a test like
LMI> (memq system-type '(windows-nt ms-dos))
LMI> to `starttls-available-p'... Opinions?
Works For Me.
Ted
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, (continued)
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/01
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/01
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/03
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/03
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/03
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/04
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/04
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/05