Re: GnuTLS for W32

[Juanma Barranquero]

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 21:39, Richard Riley <address@hidden> wrote:

> Maybe not, but just about everyone else will. Its why they are
> "defaults" : sensible choices.

What I meant is that I won't use it** so I don't care which defaults
are defined. All of them are equally good to me.

**(Assuming we're talking about an installer for Emacs. I would use an
installer for GnuTLS as a separate package.)

    Juanma